Why does this page have points requirements missing in some lvls?
Its because we haven't gathered info of some of the levels yet. PokeyMookey 20:19, January 29, 2012 (UTC)
Point development[]
I have approximated an mathematical exponential function which describes the points’ development dependent on the level number (but only for level 5 and higher, because the lower levels seem to be hardcoded values overwriting the function’s values). I have made a nice bookmarklet, which calculates all point numbers from level 0-60.
The term is in which L is the level number and P(L) is the number of points required for this level (it is reasonable to round the results). Because this function is very accurate, I question the correctness of the last table row for level 48, which actually must be the value for the next level. You don’t even have to calculate it to see that the value is just too high. I’ll soon be able to check the correct one. I could also add the most likely correct calculated number 14406775792 for now, but as I already mentioned above, the function is only an approximation which can’t be suitable for a wiki. The points for level 10 and 40 also differ slightly (by 3 and 1 respectively) – don’t really know why.
The more interesting thing about the function is that it also has a reverse function (obviously a logarithmic one)! :D So we are able to calculate the level one would have with a given number of points! The reverse function is . I also made a bookmarklet for this case – just for fun :)
--Mortalmoth 14:29, April 22, 2012 (UTC)